The music never seemed to fit, the tone could be wrong and fails to convey any kind of mood while the placement could also be inappropriate.Ĭan say nothing better about the script, which had no life or flow and tending to sound stilted and cheesy. There is very little atmosphere in the lighting too. Especially the less than slick, sometimes barely coherent, editing and erratic photography. If one's gut instinct was to avoid the film, it is best to keep it that way unless you are very, very curious (the reason for seeing it in the first place when it appeared in the more like this section) like me.įirst and foremost, 'The Evil Inside Her' looks shoddy.
Everything else is executed so dreadfully that 'The Evil Inside Her' is the complete opposite of that, starting off badly getting increasingly worse all the time with no signs of recovering. See it for the title and as a low budget horror film completest, but very little else.ĭespite how good the cover looked, it was not really enough to save 'The Evil Inside Her' from not being halfway watchable. Even from looking at the plot summary, no matter how semi-interesting the title of the film is, one knows that the film is going to be very silly, not very scary and muddled, so not good. It is one of those rare films seen recently though that did not have much of a good concept or much potential going for it in the first place.
The best thing about 'The Evil Inside Her' is the cover, that looked suitably freaky. Reviewed by TheLittleSongbird 1 / 10 Psychosis in the wilderness
0 kommentar(er)
